Is AdaptivMapr a OneSchema replacement?

Only on the healthcare axis. AdaptivMapr is a narrower product: FHIR-aware templates, multilingual clinical hints, and inherited BAA coverage. For generic B2B CSV import OneSchema is already a fine answer.

Schema-only mode minimizes data exposure — only headers and ≤3 truncated sample rows are processed. A DPA/BAA may still be required depending on the data, and mapr provides one on request. Full-data mode carries an inherited BAA — there is no separate AdaptivMapr-specific contract.

What about FHIR emit?

Templates marked with a fhir_resource emit the corresponding FHIR shape on commit — Patient, Observation, Medication, Claim.item, Coverage, Practitioner, Appointment.

How does pricing compare?

AdaptivMapr is pay-as-you-go on a prepaid token wallet (from $10, shared across our suite) — no free tier, no subscription. Every map draws a small flat fee (~$0.001); AI cleanup and convert bill the AI tokens they use at provider cost × 2 (× 0.5 with your own key). Full-data/PHI routes through our BAA-covered infrastructure. OneSchema prices per-import with a platform fee.

Can I keep OneSchema for some imports and AdaptivMapr for others?

Yes. Many teams run them side by side — OneSchema for generic B2B and AdaptivMapr for clinical templates. Feature-flag at the import-route level.

OneSchema alternative

AdaptivMapr is the healthcare-aware OneSchema alternative.

OneSchema is enterprise CSV import for B2B SaaS — polished, generic, per-import pricing. We are not pretending otherwise. AdaptivMapr’s wedge is narrower and sharper: data-minimized schema-only mode, FHIR-aware healthcare templates with multilingual hints, and a BAA posture that comes from an inherited BAA rather than negotiating a vendor-specific one.

If your import path touches PHI, FHIR, or multilingual clinical data, the trade is worth running. If it does not, stay on OneSchema.

Talk to migration Try in MCP →View pricing →

Where OneSchema wins

Polished generic B2B SaaS onboarding experience
Strong customer base in non-healthcare verticals
Per-import metering matches transactional B2B SaaS billing

Where AdaptivMapr wins

Schema-only mode, minimal data exposure (DPA/BAA on request) — works for every prospect call
FHIR resource emit on healthcare templates ships out of the box
inherited BAA coverage, not negotiated per vendor

Side by side

OneSchema vs AdaptivMapr

Only the rows where the answer is clear. If a comparison is ambiguous we have left it out rather than guess.

Capability	OneSchema	AdaptivMapr
Pricing floor	Per-import / per-row tiers with platform fee	Prepaid token wallet from $10 (no free tier, no subscription). A small flat fee per map (~$0.001); AI cleanup bills AI tokens at provider cost × 2 (× 0.5 with your own key).
MCP server (Cursor, Claude Desktop)	Not shipped	@adaptivmapr/mcp-server — schema-only tools need no key, no signup
Schema-only mode (minimal data exposure)	Not a documented mode	Default. Only headers + ≤3 sample rows ever leave the caller
Healthcare templates with BAA path	DIY — generic schema builder	10 templates (Patient, Observation, Medication, Claim.item, Coverage, Practitioner, Appointment, …) with inherited BAA coverage
FHIR resource emit	Not built-in	Templates emit FHIR resources where applicable
Learns from per-tenant corrections	Per-workspace synonyms, manually curated	Cascade auto-accept at {minN:100, minRatio:0.95} and {minN:20, minRatio:1.00} from prod corrections
Multilingual healthcare hints	EN-first, custom synonyms per tenant	DE / FR / IT / EN / ES on every healthcare field, shipped
Regulated-data validators	Generic regex / range	IBAN, BIC, GTIN, LOINC, ICD-10, ATC, CPT, NPI, GLN as first-class validators
Replaces OneSchema for generic B2B CSV import	Yes — that is the core use case	Not the wedge. Use OneSchema for non-regulated flows.

The switch

Why dev teams switch from OneSchema

OneSchema is a polished, well-engineered importer with strong adoption in generic B2B SaaS. Teams move to AdaptivMapr when their import path crosses into healthcare and OneSchema starts feeling like a generic tool being asked to do a specialist job. The pattern is consistent: a B2B SaaS adds a clinical module, the import flow needs to handle AHV/NPI/LOINC/ICD-10, the team starts curating per-template synonyms by hand, and at some point realises a healthcare-aware engine already ships these. That is the moment.

When OneSchema is actually the right call

OneSchema is the right call if your imports are generic B2B CSVs — customer rosters, transaction logs, lead lists. Their polish on the embedded import experience is hard-won and we are not trying to match it across every B2B template. The AdaptivMapr argument only holds if you sit on the healthcare side of the line.

Migration

Migration walkthrough

Export your OneSchema template definitions. For each, find the closest AdaptivMapr template — most healthcare-shaped fields are already in the catalog. For non-healthcare fields keep your existing OneSchema flow, or extend an AdaptivMapr template with custom fields. Drop the AdaptivMapr embed in alongside OneSchema with a feature flag; run them in shadow mode to confirm the mapping outcomes match before switching production traffic. Chainlog will give you a hash-chained audit of every commit during the rollout — useful for justifying the swap to your compliance team.

30-second equivalence

Before · OneSchema

// Before — OneSchema embed
new OneSchemaImporter({
  clientId: 'os_client_abc',
  templateKey: 'patients',
  userJwt: '…',
})

After · AdaptivMapr

// After — AdaptivMapr (healthcare-aware, inherited BAA coverage)
import { AdaptivMaprImport } from '@adaptivmapr/react'

<AdaptivMaprImport
  templateId="patient_demographics"
  mode="schema-only"
/>

// Server-side:
// POST /v1/uploads with template=patient_demographics

FAQ

Questions, answered

Is AdaptivMapr a OneSchema replacement?: Only on the healthcare axis. AdaptivMapr is a narrower product: FHIR-aware templates, multilingual clinical hints, and inherited BAA coverage. For generic B2B CSV import OneSchema is already a fine answer.
How is BAA handled?: Schema-only mode minimizes data exposure — only headers and ≤3 truncated sample rows are processed. A DPA/BAA may still be required depending on the data, and mapr provides one on request. Full-data mode carries an inherited BAA — there is no separate AdaptivMapr-specific contract.
What about FHIR emit?: Templates marked with a fhir_resource emit the corresponding FHIR shape on commit — Patient, Observation, Medication, Claim.item, Coverage, Practitioner, Appointment.
How does pricing compare?: AdaptivMapr is pay-as-you-go on a prepaid token wallet (from $10, shared across our suite) — no free tier, no subscription. Every map draws a small flat fee (~$0.001); AI cleanup and convert bill the AI tokens they use at provider cost × 2 (× 0.5 with your own key). Full-data/PHI routes through our BAA-covered infrastructure. OneSchema prices per-import with a platform fee.
Can I keep OneSchema for some imports and AdaptivMapr for others?: Yes. Many teams run them side by side — OneSchema for generic B2B and AdaptivMapr for clinical templates. Feature-flag at the import-route level.

Next step